Legal Opinion

Stingley v. Kirkpatrick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Stingley against Kirkpatrick, upon a promissory note.

The defendant pleaded in bar of the action, that the note sued on was joint and several, and purported to be executed by himself, one David Patton, and one Samuel Bush; that the plaintiff, at the August term of the Tippecanoe Circuit Court, 1842, impleaded this defendant, said Patton, and said Bush, in an action of debt, for .not performing the same identical promises and undertakings, and each and every of them, mentioned in the declaration in this suit; that the defendants, Patton and. said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lawrence v. VernonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Block v. EbnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Kirkpatrick v. StingleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  4. State v. HazardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API