Legal Opinion

People v. Barella

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1999No. S065511PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

In People v. Cortez (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 426 [64 Cal.Rptr.2d 71] (Cortez), the Court of Appeal for the Fifth Appellate District held that a trial judge is not required to advise a defendant, upon his or her guilty plea, that the “Three Strikes” law (Pen. Code §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) limits the defendant’s ability to earn conduct and work credits while incarcerated. In the present case, the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District (Division Three) expressly disagreed with the reasoning set forth in Cortez, instead determining that in sentencing under the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. Mendoza TelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re ResendizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. GOODWILLIECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API