Legal Opinion

Jonathan Mills Manuf'g Co. v. Whitehurst

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided July 6, 1893No. 632PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the Jonathan Mills Manufacturing Company against M. C. Whitehurst and others for infringement of letters patent No. 267.098, issued November 7, 1882, to Jonathan Mills, for an improvement in machines for bolting flour. Decree for complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

SAGE, District Judge.

The patent involved in this cause was granted November 7, 1882, to Jonathan Mills, for certain improvements in machines for dressing or bolting flour. The specification covers more than six pages of the letters issued from the *591patent office. There are 14 claims, of winch the 1st, 2d, 3d, and 6th are averred to have been infringed, by ihe defendants. The patent Is, in terms, for a “centrifugal bolt.” The claims referred to are as follows:

-<(t) In a horizontal centrifugal holt, the combination of an outer shell; a reel; revolving, longitudinal, continuously arranged tlicr…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Campbell v. JamesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. F. A. R. Liquidating Corp. v. McGraneryDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API