Kauffman v. Myer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
ERROR to Lebanon county. Christiana Myer, administratrix of Daniel Myer, against Christian Kauffman. This was an action of debt on an arbitration bond, the condition of which was as follows: “The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounden Christian Kauffman, his heirs, executors, and administrators, for his or their part and behalf, shall and do in all things well and truly stand to, obey, perform, fulfil, observe, and keep the award, order, and…
Read the full summary
ERROR to Lebanon county. Christiana Myer, administratrix of Daniel Myer, against Christian Kauffman. This was an action of debt on an arbitration bond, the condition of which was as follows: “The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounden Christian Kauffman, his heirs, executors, and administrators, for his or their part and behalf, shall and do in all things well and truly stand to, obey, perform, fulfil, observe, and keep the award, order, and arbitrament, final end, and determination of Andrew Alexander, Thomas Wenrich, and Abraham Philips, or any two of them,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Sergeant, J.
The arbitration bond submits a certain action of replevin depending in the court of common pleas of Dauphin county, and also all and all manner of action and actions, cause and causes of action, and suits in law or equity, bills, bonds, specialties, sum and sums of money, quarrels, conditions, debates, differences, dues, controversies, trespasses, damages and demands whatsoever, at any time had, &c. These words are large enough to embrace judgments and executions. The word demand is the largest word in the law except claim; and a release of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Carr v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Powers v. PenseWyoming Supreme Court · 1912