Legal Opinion

Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States ex rel. Forsberg

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1924No. 2196PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEB CUBIAM.

The defendants in error insist that there is nothing before

this court because exceptions were not duly taken. The point is serious, but we prefer to rest the affirmance of the judgment on the merits. We think the District Court (298 Fed. 320) was clearly right on all the points decided, and that nothing of substance can be added to the reasoning of the court.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Forsberg v. Fleischmann Const. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States Ex Rel. Baltimore Cooperage Co. v. McCayDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
  3. United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. Morley Const. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  4. United States Ex Rel. Noland Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  5. First Nat. Bank of San Rafael v. Philippine Refining Corp. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API