Continental Ins. Co. v. Sabine Towing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentMcCORD, Circuit Judge
I do not concur in the majority opinion.
The words “fault or privity” as used in the policy of insurance should not be limited to the interpretation placed upon similar language used in the American and English limitation of liability statutes.
I do not agree that the words “fault or privity” have a “plain and settled meaning in both popular and legal usage.” There seem to be no decisions construing the same or similar language in policies of marine insurance and I think the oral testimony of qualified witnesses, such as was offered in this case, was admissible to show that the words “fault or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- General Mutual Insurance v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Daniel v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Western Petroleum Co. v. Tidal Gasoline Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- New York & Cuba Mail SS Co. v. Continental Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.