Politz v. Brand
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant, hereafter called the buyer, bought a dwelling house from appellees, hereafter called the sellers. The contract between the parties contained the following provision: “Refrigerator, range and Venetian blinds are to remain and be a part of this contract, together with screens, storm windows, and washing saaehiae, hall and stairway carpeting.” The buyer received no storm windows with the house and brought this action predicating his claim on the sellers’ failure “to furnish” storm windows. From judgment in favor of the sellers, the buyer has appealed.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kraft v. LoweDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Eide v. TratenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Howell v. SteffeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- NATION-WIDE CHECK CORPORATION v. BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Murchison v. Peoples Contractors, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969