Legal Opinion

Politz v. Brand

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1953No. 1331PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant, hereafter called the buyer, bought a dwelling house from appellees, hereafter called the sellers. The contract between the parties contained the following provision: “Refrigerator, range and Venetian blinds are to remain and be a part of this contract, together with screens, storm windows, and washing saaehiae, hall and stairway carpeting.” The buyer received no storm windows with the house and brought this action predicating his claim on the sellers’ failure “to furnish” storm windows. From judgment in favor of the sellers, the buyer has appealed.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kraft v. LoweDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Eide v. TratenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howell v. SteffeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. NATION-WIDE CHECK CORPORATION v. BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Murchison v. Peoples Contractors, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API