Legal Opinion

Yamhill Elec. Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 10, 1930No. Docket No. 29270Published

Contribution made to the endowment fund of a local college, to assure its continuation as a substantial patron of petitioner, allowed as an ordinary and necessary business expense.

1Opinion of the Court

YAMHILL ELECTRIC CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Yamhill Elec. Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 29270.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

20 B.T.A. 1232; 1930 BTA LEXIS 1950;

October 10, 1930, Promulgated

Contribution made to the endowment fund of a local college, to assure its continuation as a substantial patron of petitioner, allowed as an ordinary and necessary business expense.

Clarence Butt, Esq., for the petitioner.

A. H. Murray, Esq., for the respondent.

ARUNDELL

Proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency of $50 in income tax for the year 1923. The single…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yamhill Elec. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API