Legal Opinion

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Mills

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1903PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. S. J. Brooks.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

Appellee sued to recover damages arising out of an injury inflicted on his knee through a defect in an angle-cock, while he, in discharge of his duties as a brakeman, was endeavoring to cut off the air on a freight train. He recovered a verdict and judgment for $7500.

It appears from the evidence that an angle-cock is a portion of the air brake attachments on a train. The air travels from the locomotive through iron pipes and hose couplings to the rear of the train. The iron pipes run underneath the cars, and at each end of the pipes at the ends of the cars there is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SomersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. v. JimenezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. CostTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Edsall v. EdsallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API