Legal Opinion

Kiley v. Bond

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Monroe; Kinne, J. Bill by Peter Kiley and others against Albert Bond, county drain commissioner, to enjoin the deepening and widening of a drain. Prom a decree for complainants, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The circuit court for the county of Monroe, in chancery, made a decree enjoining the deepening and widening of a drain known as the “Ross Drain,” as projected, within the limits of a certain highway, adjacent to the premises of the complainants. The highway was laid out and opened about the year 1866, some six years after the original drain was established. This drain is now within the limits of the highway, and it is proposed to increase its width to about 35 feet, all of which will be within the highway, except, as the defendant claims, 3 to 5 feet. If, therefore, we take the defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conrad v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Burton-Jones Development, Inc. v. FlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Burton-Jones Development, Inc. v. FlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API