Camenisch v. Umpqua Bank

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHELA CAMENISCH, et al., 10 Case No. 20-cv-05905-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. FURTHER ORDER RE 12 PREJUDGMENT INTEREST CLAIM UMPQUA BANK, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Defendant Umpqua Bank previously sought summary judgment that plaintiffs will not be 17 entitled to prejudgment interest even if they prevail on the merits of their claims. Umpqua’s 18 primary argument was that principles of collateral estoppel and/or judicial estoppel preclude 19 plaintiffs from recovering prejudgment interest against Umpqua because PFI’s approved…