Legal Opinion

Wickliffe v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 22, 1975No. CR-75-60PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellants were convicted by a jury of grand larceny. Wickliffe’s punishment was assessed at three years and Scott’s at three years (with two suspended) in the State Department of Correction. Appellants first contend for reversal that the court erred in denying their motion to suspress certain evidence. The basis for the motion was that the state acquired possession of certain items, particularly a set of tree trimming shears, by an unreasonable search and seizure which is prohibited by the Federal Fourth Amendment and Art. 2, § 15 of the Arkansas Constitution (1874).…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Herman C. West, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  5. Roach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Chisum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Hosto v. BrickellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Milburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API