Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cesar Moya v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 18, 1985No. 81-2225Published

1Dissent

COFFEY, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.1

I dissent from the majority’s glossed over representation of the facts as initially found by the district court in United States v. Moya, 561 F.Supp. 1, 2-3 (N.D.Ill.1981) and as later set forth by this court in United States v. Moya, 704 F.2d 337, 339-40 (7th Cir.1983), because the facts are vital to a proper determination of probable cause. I further dissent from the majori*328ty’s absolute refusal to apply the plain view doctrine recently enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 103 S.Ct. 1535, 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API