Legal Opinion
Courtney v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided May 16, 2007No. 07-0021-CV-W-ODS, Crim. No. 01-00253-01-CR-W-ODSPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION DENYING (1) MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF AND (2) CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY '
SMITH, District Judge.
Pending is Movant’s application for post-conviction relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the following reasons, the Motion is denied and the Court'declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability.
A
■ Defendant plead'ed guilty to eight counts of product tampering and twelve counts of adulteration and misbranding drugs. The charges stemmed from Defendant’s intentional dilution of medication designed to treat cancer and other illnesses to the point that the treatments…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Jiles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Russell Hillman McKinnon v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, A.D.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert Ray CourtneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. CourtneyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.