Legal Opinion

Holder v. Palmer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2009No. 07-1440Published

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL STEVEN HOLDER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

CARMEN PALMER, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

No. 07-1440.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: June 17, 2009.

Decided and Filed: December 9, 2009.

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

ARGUED: Ariel B. Waldman, WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE and DORR LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Mark G. Sands, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: Ariel B. Waldman, WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE and DORR LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

William C. Campbell, Eric Restuccia, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API