Legal Opinion
W. A. Rushlight Raymond G. Rushlight Betty Rushlight, and J. M. Sax, a Copartnership, Doing Business as W. A. Rushlight Company v. United States of America, United States of America v. W. A. Rushlight Raymond G. Rushlight Betty Rushlight, and J. M. Sax, a Copartnership, Doing Business as W. A. Rushlight Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1958No. 15909_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
259 F.2d 658
W. A. RUSHLIGHT; Raymond G. Rushlight; Betty Rushlight, and J. M. Sax, a Copartnership, Doing Business as W. A. Rushlight Company, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
W. A. RUSHLIGHT; Raymond G. Rushlight; Betty Rushlight, and J. M. Sax, a Copartnership, Doing Business as W. A. Rushlight Company, Appellees.
No. 15909.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
September 29, 1958.
Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied November 12, 1958.
Hutchinson, Schwab & Burdick, Denton G. Burdick, Jr., Portland, Or., for appellants.
George…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Rushlight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958