Ryan Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the administrative *648record. At issue is whether defendant acted arbitrarily and capriciously, and contrary to law, in determining that plaintiffs bid for electrical services was nonresponsive and in awarding the contract, instead, to the second lowest bidder. After carefully reviewing the submissions of the parties, and following oral argument, the court grants the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Facts
On October 9, 1998, the Lewis Research Center of the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- A & D Fire Protection, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Overstreet Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.