Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Richey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2008No. 80070-7PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Alexander, C.J.

Thomas Richey filed a motion in superior court to vacate his conviction for the crime of attempted first degree murder and the exceptional sentences imposed on him. The superior court transferred Richey’s motion to the Court of Appeals as a personal restraint petition. The Court of Appeals then transferred his petition to this court. Richey contends here that the judgment and sentence for attempted first degree murder is facially invalid and that his petition is not, as the State alleges, time-barred. He contends, additionally, that the trial court did not present valid…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Braxton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. People v. ViserIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BowermanWashington Supreme Court · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Pers. Restraint of SchorrWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In Re Personal Restraint of ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of BanksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State of West Virginia v. Marcus Stephen SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API