Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Adams

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 31, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marvel, Vice Chancellor:

On May 15, 1958, the Supreme Court of Delaware filed its mandate1 reversing the judgment2 of this Court, *497which had granted motions to dismiss the complaint in toto on the grounds that plaintiff had failed to meet the procedural requirements of Rule 23(b), Del.C.Ann., and remanded the cause. On July 3, 1958, an order vacating such judgment of dismissal was entered and various undisposed-of motions of the appearing defendants were brought to the Court’s attention. On reconsidering these applications I denied the motions to strike, reserved decision on the 12(b) (6)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1944
  3. Loft, Inc. v. GuthCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
  4. Henis v. Compania Agricola De GuatemalaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  5. Glassberg v. BoydCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Centex CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
  2. Mayer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  3. Mayer v. AdamsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API