Woodard v. State

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of armed robbery. We affirm.

1. Appellant contends that his character was impermissibly placed in issue when a police officer testified at trial that he found an available photograph of the suspect to show to certain potential witnesses for purposes of identifying the defendant. Appellant submits that such testimony indicated that defendant’s photograph was already in police records, implying that defendant had been previously arrested or convicted of another crime. We find no error.

Under the authority of Creamer v. State, 229 Ga.…