Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Bastian

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 10, 2010No. 09-3111Published

1ConcurrenceColloton, Circuit Judge

I concur in the opinion of the court, including its holding that any error in the district court’s application of USSG § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) was harmless. I write separately regarding the government’s apparent interpretation of this specific offense characteristic.

The five-level adjustment at issue applies when a defendant’s offense involved distribution of child pornography “for the receipt, or expectation of receipt, of a thing of value.” USSG § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) (emphasis added). As the court explains, this means “any transaction, including bartering or other in-kind transaction, that is conducted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. StultsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. GeinerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. James Donald GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. UltschCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API