Legal Opinion

Hance v. Peacock

Shelby County Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 16, 1960No. 15462PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By DULL, J.

The plaintiff in this action is engaged in the business of selling bottled gas and the services necessary thereto. Further, the business of the plaintiff is in the process of changing ownership. The defendant is a former employee of the plaintiff who is now engaged in the same business of selling bottled gas and services, but he is now employed by a rival company of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff over a period of 10 years or more has developed a list of customers all of whom have signed an agreement with plaintiff which has a termination provision to the effect “(a) by consumer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horth v. American Aggregates Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Pestel Milk Co. v. Model Dairy Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Soeder v. SoederOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Akron Milk Producers,. Inc. v. Lawson Milk Co.Summit County Court of Common Pleas · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Albert B. Cord Co. v. S & P Management Services, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API