Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Garrett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 3, 1985No. 84-2112PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STAMOS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Following demolition of defendant’s building, plaintiff filed this action for a demolition decree and lien in regard to the subject premises for payment of fees associated with the demolition. Defendant counterclaimed, asserting that plaintiff had demolished the property without notice or court order. After trial, the court entered judgment against defendant for payment of fees incurred by plaintiff in removing the debris associated with the demolition and entered a lien against the subject property for that amount. It is from that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blair v. ForehandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. People v. YarbroughIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. King v. DavenportIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. City of Chicago v. Rogers Park Water Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tim Pierce and Sheryl Pierce v. Village of Divernon, Illinois, a Village Duly Constituted Under the Laws of the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Bianchi v. Savino Del Bene International Freight Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Joe & Dan International Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Turpen v. City of St. FrancisvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Blanchard v. City of RalstonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API