Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1983No. Docket 63505Published

1DissentDanhof, C.J.

Plaintiff sought benefits pursuant to MCL 500.3114(1); MSA 24.13114(1), which provides:

"(1) Except as provided in subsections (2), (3), and (5), a personal protection insurance policy described in section 3101(1) applies to accidental bodily injury to the person named in the policy, the person’s spouse, and a relative of either domiciled in the same household, if the injury arises from a motor vehicle accident.”

In Citizens Mutual Ins Co v Community Services Ins, 65 Mich App 731; 238 NW2d 182 (1975), a panel of this Court held that a spouse need not be domiciled in the household of the named…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bierbusse v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Citizens Mutual Insurance v. Community Services InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API