Legal Opinion
Picciano v. Clark County
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 19, 2024No. 3:20-cv-06106Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 GAVEN PICCIANO, CASE NO. 3:20-cv-06106-DGE 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR 11 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. NOS. 141, 143, 146) CLARK COUNTY, CLARK COUNTY 12 JAIL, WELLPATH, LLC, and NAPHCARE, INC., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I INTRODUCTION 16 Before the Court are motions for summary judgment brought by Defendants NaphCare 17 (Dkt. No. 141) and Wellpath (Dkt. No. 146), and a motion for partial summary judgment brought 18 by Defendant Clark County (Dkt. No. 143). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.