All Electric Service, Inc. v. Matousek
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Three issues are raised on this appeal involving the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s action following the denial of plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
1. Did the denials in defendant’s answer constitute negative pregnants and as such were they insufficient to raise any issues in defense to plaintiff’s cause of action?
2. Were the affirmative defenses in defendant’s answer legally sufficient .to raise issues of fact so as to defeat plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings ?
3. If the answer was sufficient to raise issues in defense, then was it erroneous for the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wisconsin Collectors Asso. v. Thorp Finance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Carpenter v. Town of RollingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Cheese v. Afram Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Kuhn v. Sol. Heavenrich Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Sanderson v. HermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prior v. RathjenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Ross v. Honey Lake Protection & Rehabilitation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Prior v. RathjenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972