Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Hicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1912Published

Appeal by the plaintiff, James M. Anderson, committee, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 13th day of March, 1911, granting the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment for the annulment of a marriage.

1Dissent

Woodward, J. (dissenting);

Eugene Anderson was adjudged an. habitual drunkard in April, 1888, and in May of that year his brother, James M. Anderson, the plaintiff, was appointed committee of his person. Eugene was placed in an institution known as the Brunswick Home, in Amityville, L. I., and while there he met another inmate of the home, the defendant Josephine M. Hicks. It seems that this woman had ’ been adjudged an habitual drunkard, one James Pearson being her committee. These two incompetents, appear to have been accorded a large measure of liberty, and in June, 1894, they were joined…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gridley v. . College of St. Francis XavierNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Wood v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Coddington v. LarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API