Lush v. Woods
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
Appellants Curtis and Leone Lush appeal from a judgment in favor of Respondents Bruce Woods and Dean L. Yoder on Appellants’ claims of statutory trespass, § 537.340 RSMo 1994. 1 Appellants raise two points on appeal. First, they claim that the trial court erred in submitting to the jury the verdict director used in the case because the instruction did not allow the jury to consider whether Respondents had exceeded the scope of any consent the jury might find Appellants gave to Respondents to cut or destroy trees located on Appellants’ property. Second, they claim that the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anglim v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WilburnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State v. TooleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Miller v. Riss & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Vandergriff v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Messina v. PratherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Wilson v. River Market Venture, I, L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Precision Electric, Inc. v. Ex-Amish Specialties, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Long v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pearson v. PearsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.