Legal Opinion

Liberty &C. Ins. Co. v. Mead Corporation

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1963No. 21964PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

For determination is whether an insurer was required to defend remaining actions against the insured after it had, with the consent and contribution of the insured, exhausted the policy limit of liability by settling two of the suits arising from the same accident.

This issue arose in a petition filed in the Civil Court of Fulton County by the insured, Mead Corporation, against its insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. In it Mead sought to recover from Liberty attorney’s fees and expenses which Mead incurred after Liberty refused to participate further in the defense of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Employers Insurance v. Goble Aircraft Specialties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. New England Box Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Zurich Insurance v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Greenwood Cemetery, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API