Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bourg v. Marrero

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 20, 1913No. 19,618PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Eighth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson; Prentice E. Edrington, Judge. Action by the State, on the relation of I-I. M. Bourg, District Attorney Twentieth Judicial District, against L. H. Marrero, Jr., District Attorney Twenty-Eighth Judicial District, for the removal of defendant from office. From a judgment for defendant, the relator appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

*114On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, J.

[6] This is an action for the removal from office of the defendant district attorney, and the petition alleges that it is brought under articles 217, 221, and 222 of the Constitution, and Act 135 of 1880. There was judgment in the district court in favor of defendant, from which relator was granted an appeal. Defendant moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the order of appeal was granted on August 31st, and the appeal was thereby made returnable within 10 days from that date, but, that it was not so returned; that on the eleventh day after the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Broussard v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  2. Brooks v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  3. Welch v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Carrol v. MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Whitaker v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. United States Ex Rel. Montgomery v. RagenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949
  3. Saint v. IrionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. Hotard v. Consolidated CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Peterson v. MayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API