United States v. Danielczyk
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.
The issue before the Court is whether, in the wake of Citizens United v. FEC, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), Defendants can be charged with directing corporate money to a political campaign. Finding that Citizens United precludes such charges, on May 26, 2011, this Court dismissed Count Four and Paragraph 10(b) of the Indictment. [Dkts. 60, 62.] Following that decision, because this Court “owes no deference to itself’ 1 and can correct its own opinions, this Court requested additional briefing and argument as to whether, in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Iowa Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. TookerDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
- Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.