Legal Opinion

United States v. Danielczyk

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided June 7, 2011No. 1:11cr85 (JCC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.

The issue before the Court is whether, in the wake of Citizens United v. FEC, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), Defendants can be charged with directing corporate money to a political campaign. Finding that Citizens United precludes such charges, on May 26, 2011, this Court dismissed Count Four and Paragraph 10(b) of the Indictment. [Dkts. 60, 62.] Following that decision, because this Court “owes no deference to itself’ 1 and can correct its own opinions, this Court requested additional briefing and argument as to whether, in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Iowa Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. TookerDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
  3. Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API