Legal Opinion
Hellerman v. Schantz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 24, 1908Published
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Jacob Hellerman against Harry Schantz and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Per curiam
The pleadings are oral. The complaint is "action on a check,” and the answer is “general denial and' demand bill.” A bill of particulars was given, which reads as follows:
The above action is brought to recover the sum of $56.60, with interest from May 16, 1908, due on a check given to plaintiff by Harry Schantz, etc., one of the defendants, and originally made by Sam Goldman. The following is a copy of the check in question:
“No. -. New York, May 16, 1908.
“The Corn Exchange Bank.
“Eleventh Ward Branch. Payable through
New York Clearing House.
“Pay to H. Schantz or order Fifty-Six «o/ioe Dollars.
"$…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Edelman v. RamsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908