Cobb v. Stephens
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceBanke, Presiding Judge
I agree with all that is stated in the majority decision but wish to add a few additional observations.
Like the federal rule on which it is modeled, “the aim of the relation back rule . . . contained in [Section 15 (c) of the Georgia Civil Practice Act] is to ameliorate the impact of the statute of limitation. See Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 1496.” Rich’s, Inc. v. Snyder, 134 Ga. App. 889, 892-893 (216 SE2d 648) (1975). “A narrow technical reading of this Code section would defeat the purposes for which it was designed.” Id.
To read the statute as qualifiedly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rich's, Inc. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Sam Finley, Inc. v. Interstate Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Gordon v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- A. H. Robins Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Dover Place Apartments v. a & M Plumbing & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.