Legal Opinion

United States v. Bentvena

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 7, 1961No. 26869_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

288 F.2d 442

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee,

v.

William BENTVENA, Carlie Di Pietro, Joseph Fernandez,

Carmine Galante, Angelo Loicano, Frank Mari,

Samuel Monastersky, John Ormento,

William Struzzieri,

Petitioners-Appellants.

No. 26869.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 7, 1961.

Decided Feb. 7, 1961.

James K. Branigan, New York City, for petitioners-appellants William Bentvena and William Struzzieri.

William Kleinman, Brooklyn, for petitioners-appellants Carlie Di Pietro and Frank Mari.

Thomas A. Wadden, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioner-appellant Carmine Galante.

G…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Hood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. GalloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  2. United States v. Salvatore PanicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Carlie DipietroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Carmine GalanteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Gavino v. MacMahonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API