Legal Opinion

City of Memphis v. Bethel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Shelby county. Irving Halsey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, C. J.

These causes commenced by petitions for mandamus against the city of Memphis, in the second circuit court of Shelby county. The several relators are holders and owuers of coupons of the bonds of the city of Memphis, representing interest on the bonds past due. They all obtained writs of alternative mandamus, and after returns thereto the writs of mandamus were made peremptory, from which judgments the city has appealed. Hpon looking into the several cases, we find that the pleadings have been made up in the case of P. 0. Bethel, in a manner more fully to raise the questions to he decided than…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Griffith v. BurdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Memphis v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  2. Brown v. Crystal Ice Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API