Legal Opinion

Kirkland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 2011No. 1D09-3325PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Ronald Deerick Kirkland appeals his convictions, entered after jury trial and verdicts, and the 40-year sentence im*1148posed upon the trial court’s granting of post-conviction relief. In his motion for post-conviction relief, Appellant had claimed that the trial court illegally imposed the adult sanctions because the court never considered the propriety of juvenile sanctions, as required by section 985.565(4)(a)2., Florida Statutes. The trial court corrected this error by acknowledging the availability of juvenile sanctions and the particular circumstances of this case. The court then imposed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. VallesColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Jordan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Owens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API