Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bensel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a tax case1 which depends on its own particular decisive facts. By reference to the opinion r ” ’he Tax Board, in which the proofs are A'ti't.’d at length, we avoid needless repetition, ' ■ A.s no precedents t,r principles are iiivcjived, and as we find ourselves in acco -tl 'with its decision, we might well limit untrsuives to its opinion. In view of this, w J confine our opinion to a few brief staion ;nts.
The casé concerns the taxable value of stock in the Driver-Harris Company and the question involved is whether the full value of the stock should be…
2Cited by34 opinions
- Estate of Reynolds v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Gregory v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Goetchius v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Estate of True v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Estate of Littick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.