United States v. Anne Hankins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal we resolve two related questions of first impression in our circuit that arise out of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), a statute that requires certain criminal defendants to pay restitution to compensate and assist victims. We first determine whether a defendant may discharge a restitution judgment based on a private settlement between the victim and the defendant. The answer is no—restitution is a criminal sentence that cannot be extinguished by a victim’s disclaimer of benefits. Relatedly, we decide whether a district court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Paul J. SavoieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Jack BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Wilkinson v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- United States v. Alston Orlando Leroy WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. John Jerome O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.