Ray v. Alexandria Mall ex rel. St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LABORDE, Judge.
Plaintiff, Frances Ray, appeals the decision of the lower court sustaining defendant’s, Alexandria Mall Company, peremptory exception of prescription. We affirm. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the lower court was correct in sustaining the exception and thereby dismissing Ray’s suit.
Frances Ray filed suit on February 4, 1982, alleging that on February 18, 1981, she slipped and fell inside the Alexandria Mall. Ray named the Alexandria Mall, a non-existent legal entity, as the sole defendant describing it as a “corporation organized under the laws of Louisiana”. On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Majesty v. Comet-Mercury-Ford Co. of Lorain, Mich.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Conner v. Continental Southern Lines, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Hill v. ProvozanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ray v. Alexandria MallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Chargois v. FreminLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ray v. Alexandria Mall ex rel. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983