Legal Opinion

Ray v. Alexandria Mall ex rel. St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1982No. 82-426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LABORDE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Frances Ray, appeals the decision of the lower court sustaining defendant’s, Alexandria Mall Company, peremptory exception of prescription. We affirm. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the lower court was correct in sustaining the exception and thereby dismissing Ray’s suit.

Frances Ray filed suit on February 4, 1982, alleging that on February 18, 1981, she slipped and fell inside the Alexandria Mall. Ray named the Alexandria Mall, a non-existent legal entity, as the sole defendant describing it as a “corporation organized under the laws of Louisiana”. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Majesty v. Comet-Mercury-Ford Co. of Lorain, Mich.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Conner v. Continental Southern Lines, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Hill v. ProvozanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alexandria MallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Chargois v. FreminLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Ray v. Alexandria Mall ex rel. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API