Acquackanonk v. Christensen

Complainant's bill is for the foreclosure of a mortgage held by it. With the view of ultimately rendering them liable upon their bond for any resultant deficiency, as required by P.L. 1933ch. 82 p. 172, Harry A. Hecht and Abram Preiskel were joined as parties defendants therein. Both of these defendants have filed an answer asserting that the bond, notwithstanding their respective signatures thereon, is legally inefficacious as against them, because of its non-delivery to complainant. By way of counter-claim, these defendants also seek to recover money which they claim to have paid…