Legal Opinion

Michael v. Horn

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 18, 2006No. 04-9002PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

After finding Hubert Michael competent to terminate his habeas corpus petition in this death-penalty case, the District Court dismissed that petition. The dismissal was appealed, purportedly on Michael’s behalf. He later vacillated on his desire to dismiss this appeal. We hold that the presumption of continuing competency does not apply here because the foundational expert for the District Court’s competency finding has suggested a new evaluation. We therefore remand to the District Court for another competency finding.

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

A.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Demosthenes v. BaalSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. HagermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. BROWN v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API