Legal Opinion

United States v. Dennis Mark Meyers

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1969No. 12653_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, in which we deemed oral argument unnecessary, it appears that defendant was convicted of a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. On March 29, 1968, he was sentenced to a three-year term, under the provisions of 18 U.S.C.A. § 4208(a) (2). Notwithstanding that he was represented by court-appointed counsel, he was advised by the district judge of his right to appeal within ten days, and that if he could not employ but desired counsel, counsel would be furnished to him. He was further told that if he wished to appeal, he should notify the clerk, or notify the Court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fallen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. Elam Reamuel TempleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norman Rothman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Richard L. TallmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Norman Rothman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API