Legal Opinion

Haas v. . Cathey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CuRIam.

There is no error in the judgment sustaining the demurrers filed by the defendants in this action. The order of the Superior Court discharging the defendant, John H. Cathey, as receiver of the Piedmont Electric Company, is conclusive. It is not subject to collateral attack by an independent action. It may be set aside and vacated only for fraud or mistake, by a motion in the cause in which he was appointed and discharged as receiver. Sarratt v. Gaffney Carpet Mfg. Co., 77 S. C., 85, 57 S. E., 616. Until thus set aside and vacated, no action to recover on account of his liability as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sarratt v. Gaffney City Carpet Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bates v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API