People v. Sandoval
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CHIN, J.,
Concurring and Dissenting.—Although I concur in the judgment affirming defendant’s convictions, enhancements, and sentence, for reasons explained below, I do not agree that we should vacate the lying-in-wait special circumstance. Nor do I agree that the trial court erred in precluding defense counsel from making erroneous and inaccurate statements to the jury regarding a sentence of life without possibility of parole, i.e., that the sentence “means that you will never get out” and that defendant “will spend the rest of his life in a California maximum security prison.” I also do not…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. MoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. AshmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. FierroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.