Legal Opinion · Dissent

Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 11, 1998No. Nos. 97-1384, 97-1397Published

1DissentWald, Circuit Judge

I disagree with the panel that the statutory provision for severance pay for rail workers who lose their jobs as a result of short-line acquisitions under section 10902(d) is unambiguously limited to workers who after the acquisition will no longer work for the selling railroad. In my view, the text of the •relevant provision is decidedly ambiguous, the legislative history sheds no appreciable additional light on its meaning, and I would therefore proceed to a Chevron step two analysis, which defers to the Surface Transportation Board’s (“the Board”) reasonable determination that all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API