Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Doll

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1902No. 14,474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judicial district court, parish of Caddo; Alfred Dillingham Land, Judge. Action by Jackson Bros, against H. F. Doll. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

BREAUX, T.

Plaintiffs, who were defendant’s lessees, sue to recover damages from the defendant in the sum of $13,455,00, being the alleged difference between the contract rental price and actual rental value of the building’íór 103V> months on the ground that he (the defendant), without right so to do, put an end to the contract of lease under which they held.

The lease in question was for five years, with the privilege of renewing it at the expiration of the lease for another five years. About a year after the contract of lease had been entered into, the building leased caught fire.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hinrichs v. Tulane Educational FundSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bossier Center, Inc. v. Palais Royal, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API