Gilford v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
Shannel Gilford appeals after a jury found her guilty of residential mortgage fraud. Gilford contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, that the trial court erred in admitting and in failing to admit certain evidence and testimony, and also that the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial after remarks made during the prosecutor’s closing argument. After reviewing the record, we conclude there was no error and affirm.
Shannel Gilford, Andrea Johnson, and Shirlene Smith, the three co-defendants at trial, were accused of residential…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schofield v. HolseySupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Rutledge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- State v. CorhenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Colbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010