Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Pataki
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 29, 2002No. 02 Civ. 618, 02 Civ. 3843PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
I. Introduction
On June 18, 2002, Christopher Earl Strunk appearing pro se submitted a “Notice of Motion as Intervenor” in Rodriguez v. Pataki, 02 Civ. 618, and Allen v. Pataki, 02 Civ. 3843.1 On June 25, 2002, the Attorney General of the State of New York opposed Mr. *217Strunk’s intervention on the grounds, inter alia, that it was not “accompanied by a pleading” as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(c). At a hearing on June 28, 2002, the Court advised Mr. Strunk to submit a short and plain statement of a claim showing that he was entitled to relief. Transcript of Hearing, June 28, 2002 at 6 (“So…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Schulz v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- New York News, Inc. v. KheelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Stinson v. SHERIFF'S DEPT. OF SULLIVAN CTY.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Building and Realty Institute of Westchester and Putnam Counties, Inc. v. State Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Cross Sound Cable Company, LLC v. Long Island Lighting CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022