D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. Guy W. Pearson, Collector of Taxes, District of Columbia, and James L. Martin, Tax Assessor, District of Columbia

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel.

On consideration whereof, and the Court being of opinion that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law by payment of the tax, claim for refund, and either appeal to the District of Columbia Tax Court or civil action in the District Court, and counsel for the District of Columbia having given assurance of agreement to the foregoing view, and it thus appearing that suit for injunction will not lie (D.C.Code, § 47-2410 (1951)), it is

Ordered and adjudged by…