Legal Opinion

Coots v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 12, 1992No. 01-90-00401-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery. After considering appellant’s plea of true to two enhancements for aggravated assault and forgery, the jury assessed punishment at 70 years confinement. We reverse and remand.

Appellant contends the evidence was insufficient, the trial court erred in allowing the bailiff to testify after the rule had been invoked, and the trial court erred in admitting hearsay evidence that appellant had used a telephone number which the robber gave the victim the day before the robbery. We hold the evidence was sufficient, but harmful…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Schaffer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Gonzales v. Beto, Corrections DirectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bunton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. Estrada v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  3. Curtis R. Moffett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  4. Davey Regene Kinnett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  5. Kristopher Kyle Russell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API